Friday, November 2, 2012

Great Course on The History of Ancient Egypt


I just finished "The History of Ancient Egypt" course by Prof Bob Brier from The Great Courses.

This is a great, comprehensive course on the 3000-plus history of the Ancient Egypt Civilization. I bought the DVD version and listened to it in my car. When I started, I didn't really know much about Ancient Egypt except for some vague ideas about Ramses (being the Pharaoh during Moses' era) and Ptolemi's era (being one of Alexander the Great's generals).

This 48-half-hour-lecture course is so comprehensive that after I finished it, I feel I am more knowledgable on the following topics: 
1. How Napoleon was instrumental as a catalyst for important discoveries of Ancient Egypt. 
2. How the great, important pyramids of Ancient Egypt were actually constructed in the Old Kingdom (but not later) - circa 2,600 BC.
3. How the Hyksos 'came into' Egypt during the second intermediate period (circa 1,700 BC) and this is perhaps related to when Joseph arrived in Egypt. 
4. The fabulous 18th Dynasty (of the New Kingdom) with characters including: Tuthmosis I, Queen Hatshepsut, Amenhotep III, the mysterious Akhenaten, his Queen Nefertiti, their son Tutanhkhamen, his wife Ankhesenamen. 
5. A great detour on mummies and how to create a modern mummy!
6. Ramses the Great during Moses' Exodus era. (Dynasty XIX). 
7. Lastly, Alexander the Great, the Ptolemis, and Cleopatra (the last Pharaoh). 

I am now interested to go with my wife and family to visit Egypt one day and go through a comprehensive historical tour of key locations. Prof Bob Brier also conducts a tour (I found this through Google) of Egypt: http://www.farhorizons.com/trips/EgyptAfrica/MajestyofEgypt/Travel-with-Bob-Brier-on-MajestyofEgypt.php - I look forward to going there one day. 

Prof Bob Brier is a great great storyteller. One of the best professors in "The Great Courses".

Saturday, September 15, 2012


I read this story below about Bruce Lee a long time ago - perhaps 15 years ago. I was inspired by it then. But now that I am a runner, I can appreciate this story even more.... Don't stay on a plateau, you must exceed it!


From a close friend of Bruce Lee’s…
Bruce had me up to three miles a day, really at a good pace. We’d run the three miles in twenty-one or twenty-tow minutes. Just under eight minutes a mile [Note: when running on his own in 1968, Lee would get his time down to six-and-a-half minutes per mile].
So this morning he said to me “We’re going to go five.”
I said, “Bruce, I can’t go five. I’m a helluva lot older than you are, and I can’t do five.”
He said, “When we get to three, we’ll shift gears and it’s only two more and you’ll do it.”
I said “Okay, hell, I’ll go for it.”
So we get to three, we go into the fourth mile and I’m okay for three or four minutes, and then I really begin to give out.
I’m tired, my heart’s pounding, I can’t go any more and so I say to him, “Bruce if I run any more,” — and we’re still running — “if I run any more I’m liable to have a heart attack and die.” He said, “Then die.” It made me so mad that I went the full five miles.
Afterward I went to the shower and then I wanted to talk to him about it. I said, you know, “Why did you say that?” He said, “Because you might as well be dead. Seriously, if you always put limits on what you can do, physical or anything else, it’ll spread over into the rest of your life. It’ll spread into your work, into your morality, into your entire being. There are no limits. There are plateaus, but you must not stay there, you must go beyond them. If it kills you, it kills you. A man must constantly exceed his level.”

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Great Course on World's Greatest Structures


I just completed the 24-half-hour-lecture course "Understanding the World's Greatest Structures: Science and Innovation from Antiquity to Modernity" from The Teaching Company (link is here: http://www.thegreatcourses.com/tgc/courses/course_detail.aspx?cid=1153). It's an AMAZING course and I learnt a lot from it. Below is my review of this course at the Teaching Company website.

Regards
Tri

"This is, simply, one of the BEST courses from The Teaching Company.

A couple of reasons why this is such a great course:

1. Professor Ressler is an outstanding presenter; very passionate about the topic, and produces great demo/models to illustrate the insights he's teaching.

2. The course is very well organised into 3 sections: The first 4 or so lectures discusses the science of structures (free-body diagram etc., equilibrium, forces, moments etc.); the second part (6 or so lectures) discusses basic structural configurations (columns, beams, arches, trusses, etc.); and the third part (the best) actually goes through real-world great structures. The course is well structured.

3. Prof Ressler not only explains the great structures, but he also goes through the historical evolution of great structures. I found these historical stories truly enlightening.

4. Prof Ressler also covers failures of structures (such as collapsing bridges) and explains WHY these structures collapsed and HOW these failures led to the next level of innovation. Fascinating!

5. The accompanying course booklet is fantastic, with detailed & clear answers at the back for most questions.

Overall, this is an absolutely wonderful course. I learnt a lot from it, so much that since viewing the course, I often look at structures (buildings, bridges, towers) on the way to work in a new light!!"

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Excellent & Passionate review of Modern China History



I just completed the course "The Fall and Rise of China" by Professor Richard Baum at the Great Courses (http://www.thegreatcourses.com/tgc/courses/course_detail.aspx?cid=8370). This is my 30th completed course from this company. My review of this excellent course is below: 

This is one of the best courses at The Great Courses. Partly, this is because Professor Richard Baum is an excellent and passionate presenter. 48 half-hour lectures just pass through in no time at all.


I have been a long-term China watcher - but my knowledge before I watched this course was more 'complete' in the 'ancient' Chinese historical segment and not the modern 20th century one. This course illuminated the latter outstandingly.

Like typical historical courses, this course outlines the modern history of China in a time-chronological manner, from the beginning of the 'fall' of the Chinese dynasties in the late 19th century, to China in the 21st century (this course was done sometime in 2010 and it thus covered China until then). In between, it covered important events in the modern history of China, which included:
- Birth of Chinese communist party (CCP),
- The May 4th movement,
- The fight between the CCP and the opposing Guomindang,
- The Japan invasion,
- The disastrous Great Leap Forward,
- The equally-disastrous Cultural Revolution,
- Post-Mao era and early-Deng Xiao Ping,
- The Tiananment "event" in 1989 and what caused it,
- The roaring China in the 1990s and 2000s, and
- The 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics.

I think this course complemented nicely the other The Great Courses course on China ("From Yao to Mao") which covered more the 'ancient' history of China; this one continues pretty much where that course left of.

I highly recommend this course to anyone who is interested in the modern history of this country, which soon will be the largest country in the world (in GDP terms).

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Great Quotes on Giving

I found some great quotes on Giving today. The link is here: http://saintannes.episcopalatlanta.org/images/customer-files/St_Anne_s_Episcopal_Church/tithing.pdf

Some of my favourite quotes are:


I never would have been able to tithe the first million dollars I ever made if I had not tithed
my first salary, which was $1.50 per week.” — JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, SR. (1839-1937),
AMERICAN INDUSTRIALIST AND PHILANTHROPIST


There's no good reason to be the richest man in the cemetery.   COL. SANDERS, FOUNDER OF
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN


"I have observed 100,000 families over my years of investment counseling.  I always saw
greater prosperity and happiness among those families who tithed than among those who
didn't."  SIR JOHN TEMPLETON, CHAIRMAN OF TEMPLETON FUNDS

When we give to God, we are just taking our hands off what already belongs to Him.

“Examples are few of men ruined by giving.” — CHRISTIAN BOVÉE


“You have not lived until you have done something for someone who can never repay
you.” — JOHN BUNYAN (1628-88), ENGLISH PURITAN WRITER AND PREACHER


“Giving frees us from the familiar territory of our own needs by opening our mind to the
unexplained worlds occupied by the needs of others.” — BARBARA BUSH (1925- ), FORMER
AMERICAN FIRST LADY


“I was once young and now I am old, but not once have I been witness to God’s failure to
supply my need when first I had given for the furtherance of His work. He has never failed
in His promise, so I cannot fail in my service to Him.” — WILLIAM CAREY (1761-1834), BAPTIST
MISSIONARY TO INDIA


“No one has ever become poor by giving.” — ANNE FRANK (1929-45), JEWISH DUTCH DIARIST
DURING NAZI OCCUPATION


“Dearest lord, teach me to be generous; teach me to serve you as you deserve; to give and
not to count the cost.” — IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA (1491-1556), JESUIT FOUNDER


“The only investment I ever made which has paid consistently increasing dividends is the
money I have given to the Lord.” — JAMES L. KRAFT (1874-1953), KRAFT-PHOENIX CHEESE
CORP. CHAIRMAN


“I believe it is every man’s religious duty to get all he can honestly and to give all he can.”
— JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, SR. (1839-1937), AMERICAN INDUSTRIALIST AND PHILANTHROPIST


“Think of giving not as a duty but as a privilege.” — JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, JR. (1874-1960),
AMERICAN INDUSTRIALIST AND PHILANTHROPIST


Never measure your generosity by what you give, but rather by what you have left.” —
BISHOP FULTON J. SHEEN (1895-1979), ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP


“Even if I give the whole of my worth to Him, He will find a way to give back to me much
more than I gave.” — CHARLES HADDON SPURGEON (1834-92), ENGLISH BAPTIST PREACHER


“What the Bible says is really true—it’s better to give than to receive.” — TED TURNER
(1938- ), MEDIA MOGUL AND PHILANTHROPIST















Sunday, May 6, 2012

2012 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting - Summary Notes

Dear all, 


Every year around this time I summarise to my family and close colleagues the summary of Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting 2012 which happened last night Australia time. 
My sources are three LIVE blogs - from Wall Street Journal, The Motley Fool and The New York Times. 
Here is the summary of this year's annual meeting's discussion points I found interesting: 

On his Health and his Prostrate Cancer situation: 
Buffett: "I feel terrific. I always feel terrific. I love what I do, I work with people I love. It's more fun every day. I seem to have a good immune system."
"I have four doctors. At least a few of them own Berkshire stock. My wife, my daughter, and I listened to the four of them a few weeks ago. They described the various alternatives. The ones they recommend do not require a day of hospitalization. Don't require a day off work. 99%+ survival rate. This is a minor event."

Munger: "I don't know (if I have prostate cancer) because I don't let them test for it."
"I rather resent the attention he (Buffett) is getting."

Buffett: "In all seriousness, it is a non-event. The med center is about two minutes from the office. For two months, I'll walk over there."

On Berkshire Succession and the CEO being the Chief Risk Officer: 
Warren Buffett: "The CEO of any large (particularly financial) company should be the Chief Risk Officer as well. Not a function that should be delegated. I am the Chief Risk Officer at Berkshire. Up to me to understand anything that would hit us in a catastrophic way. I would not select any successor that did not possess that ability. Person at the top must have good visibility into insurance operations and managers." [Tri: I think it's going to be AJIT JAIN].
"Basic risks could include excessive leverage or insurance risk."

Charlie Munger: "Not only is risk frequently delegated, but it was delegated to people who managed it badly.", "Value-at-risk is one of the dumbest metrics ever." and
"Favorite risk control example: young employee was fired once 'how can you fire me - I'm one of your top producers?'... answer: I'm old and rich and you make me nervous"

Buffett: "Charlie and I think about worst cases all the time." 
"I don't like ever exposing us to anything that would cause me to worry about Berkshire's financial position if the Federal Reserve were hit by a nuclear bomb or something."
"We think about worst cases all the time, then we add a big margin of safety. I enjoyed tossing newspapers, but I don't want to go back to that again."
"We won't take a risk (even a favorable one) if the downside means that Berkshire will go broke. We'll never risk what we have and need for things we don't have and don't need."

Buffett: "I don't think my successor will be able to do every deal that I've done, but most of them. Berkshire will still have tremendous financial strength."
"The successor we have in mind would not leave for more lucrative jobs. He/she loves the Berkshire culture. Successor doesn't need money -- will only work because he/she finds it to be the most enjoyable thing in the world."

On Berkshire's recent Sweetheart Deals (Goldman preferred, GE preferred etc.) and how they might not be there after Buffett is gone:
Buffett: "The negotiated deals (Goldman Sachs, GE) were not extremely meaningful to Berkshire. These deals were just peanuts compared to the value created by buying businesses like Geico, BNSF. 

On China and Giving Advice: 
An audience asked Buffett and Munger about them giving advice to China. 
Munger: "We're not spending much time giving advice to China... China's been doing very well from a very tough start. To some extent we should seek advice rather than giving."

Buffett: "In almost sixty years of investing, we've found it practically useless to give advice to anyone." and "we rarely give advice to the CEOs of our owned companies. If we thought that the success of our investment depended on them following our advice, we'd probably move on to something else."

On China having great companies like Coca-Cola one day - Buffett: "China has some great companies already."
"We tend to export certain products well -- consumer products. China's got some huge companies. They may eclipse the market value of some US companies."

On Berkshire's Market Value now:
Buffett: "If we could have our way, Berkshire stock would trade once a year (at Warren and Charlie's estimate of intrinsic value)." and "Fair value is significantly above 110% of book value." [Tri: Currently it's about 114% of book value].

Buffett: "We've run Berkshire for 47 years. There have been 4 or 5 times when we thought it was significantly undervalued. We saw the stock get cut roughly in half four times."
"The beauty of stocks is they do sell at silly prices sometimes. That's how Charlie and I got rich."
"Mr. Market is kind of a psychotic drunk. He will do very weird things sometimes. Remember, he's there to serve you, not guide you."
"It's built into the system that stocks get mispriced. Berkshire is no exception. Berkshire tends to track its intrinsic value more closely than most businesses."
"At some point, Berkshire will be significantly overvalued. At some point, it will be significantly undervalued."
"You don't have to do anything to make money in the stock market. Stick with businesses that you think you can value. It's a marvelous game."

On US Banking vs European Banking: 
Buffett: "US banking system is in fine shape. US banks are far better positioned than they were 3 or 4 years ago. Buttressed their capital in a big way. Bigger banks have liquidity coming out their ears."

Buffett: "European Central Bank had to replace funding that was running off from European banks. Euro banks need more capital, couldn't raise it at advantageous prices. ECB solved that problem. Europe has a lot of problems."

Munger: "[Europe is] difficult without fiscal union... we're more comfortable with the risk profiles in the US."

Buffett: "It's night and day. In the fall of 2008, Bernanke and Paulson would do whatever it took. You knew they had the power and the will. Imagine if the governors of 17 US states had to act in tandem back in 2008. Euro banks and US banks are in two very different categories."
"We have seen the ECB give $1 trillion to banks. It's like giving a guy with a bad margin account even more money to play with."

On Current Prices of Energy and Energy Independence:
Munger: "Never thought 50:1 ratio of Oil: Natural Gas would exist."

Buffett: "Never thought this big a discrepancy between oil and nat gas was possible."

Munger: "I think the idea of energy independence is the most foolish idea I've ever heard adults talk about. We don't want energy independence, we want to conserve the stuff."

On GEICO: 
Buffett: "Geico is worth a whole lot more than tangible book value. Estimates around $15B or so."

Buffett: "I would value Geico differently than General Re. I would say Geico has an intrinsic value that's significantly greater than its net worth + float."
"General Re was off the track when we bought it. More concerned with growth than profitability." Munger: "We finally got it fixed."
"At Geico it's very reasonable to expect profitable underwriting and growing float for as far as the eye can see. This is possible because Geico is the low-cost producer. Has real advantages that make it tough for other companies to duplicate."

On MBA and Business School Education:
Buffett: "It is astounding to me how business schools have focused on one fad after another in finance theory. Usually very mathematically based."
"Almost impossible to resist if you're hoping to advance along an academic career path."
"I would have a course on how to value a business and how to think about markets. Far more valuable than modern portfolio theory or option pricing."

Munger: "The optimal way to price options is not to use the Black-Scholes method, which is the current default method."

On the Buffett rule (on Taxation):
Buffett: "Tax rate should be commensurate with what you earned. Under the Buffett Rule, we would have a minimum tax for very, very high earners that would restore their rate to what it used to be. It would affect very, very, very few people."

On Renewables energy: 
Buffett: "We're much bigger in wind than solar (although increasing presence in solar)." 
"I don't think any solar or wind would be working without subsidies."

Munger: "We need to take a lot of power from renewables. It's wise to subsidise the development of that sector."

On Future Acquisitions/Investments: 
Buffett: "We considered one a month or two ago. About $22B. I wish we could have made it. We won't use our stock at all."
"Used stock for BNSF acquisition, that was a mistake. We would not use our stock (as currency for an acquisition) now."
" We won't take our cash below $20B."
"We are investing heavily in the US. We'd like to do more business in the United States... and India, Korea, Japan -- you name it."
"There is no shortage of opportunity in the US. It's a real land of opportunity."
"Cash is still our favorite medium for purchase."

Answering the Question of a young 26 year old on what would Buffett do if he were 26 today: 
Buffett: "I would probably do very much what I have done in life, only I would try to do it earlier. I would try to develop an audited record of performance as early as I could to attract money. Then I would turn to something much more interesting: buying businesses to keep. I don't want to be buying and selling businesses."

On Macro Factors: 
Buffett: "Everybody thinks we sit around and talk about macro factors. We don't have any discussions about that."

On Berkshire's existing Businesses - which ones have done well and why:
Buffett: "The big ones have done well. Railroads are an asset that can't be duplicated. Move vital goods in an environmentally friendly way. Much better business than it was five or ten years ago."
"Geico has also improved a lot. Approaching 10% market share now."

Munger: "80% of our businesses have improved their positions."

Buffett: "The mistakes we've made are where I misjudged the competitive position of the business."

On Gold: 
Buffett: "When we took over Berkshire, gold was at $20, and Berkshire was at $15. Gold is now at $1600 and Berkshire is $120,000."
"It's very hard for an unproductive investment to be a productive investment over a long period of time."

On the Newspaper Business / Industry:
Buffett: "Newspapers have 3 problems -- 2 of them are very difficult."
"If you go back 50 years, a newspaper was the primary source of information. That information in now available elsewhere -- more timely, and often free."
"Cites many examples (stocks, jobs, apartments, sports). Newspapers have lost primacy in all these areas."
"As long as they stay primary for local info, newspapers will be of interest."
"However, newspapers are expensive to distribute."
"And they're putting the same content online (for free) that they charge you for in the print version.."
"I think there's an opportunity for newspapers to exist in places where people care about the community. And don't give away that product."
"I think the economics of newspapers will work out okay. Not like the old days, but it still serves an important focus."

On Technology potentially destroying certain Industries (like Newspapers) & on Amazon.com:
Munger: "We had a similar situation with World Book... about 80% of that was destroyed by Bill Gates (laughter). We're still selling encyclopedias, but not as many as we used to."

Buffett: "Amazon's a tough one to figure. It could affect a lot of businesses that don't think they'll be affected. It's huge, it's a powerhouse."
"I thought originally that only young people would embrace the internet. If the consumer finds something that they like to do better... it's very hard to find people that have done business with Amazon that aren't happy."

Munger: "The internet (Amazon) will hugely affect a lot of people (retailers)."

On Wal-Mart and its current Bribery Scandal: 
Buffett: "They made a mistake with how it was handled. But I don't think it changes the fundamental dynamics -- this is a good retailer."
"I don't think the earnings power of Wal-Mart five years from now will be materially affected."

Munger: "When you're as big as Wal-Mart, you're going to have the occasional problem."

Buffett: "When you're as big as Berkshire, you're going to have problems too. We have [270,000] employees at Berkshire. I guarantee someone right now is doing something wrong."

On Declining Businesses:
Buffett: "Generally speaking, it pays to stay away from declining businesses. We started with declining businesses: Textiles, US-made shoes, a department store in Baltimore."
"We have invested in several declining businesses. We think we understand them pretty well. There's a price that we will pay to invest there -- but that's not where we make our real money. I would never spend a lot of time studying a declining business. The same amount of energy and intelligence devoted to other businesses will work out better."

Munger: "We started with declining businesses. Textiles, US-made shoes, a department store in Baltimore."

On Google and Apple:
Buffett: "Both extraordinary companies, obviously. Huge companies that make lots of money, great returns on capital, tough to dislodge. I would not be at all surprised to see them worth more money 10 years from now..."
"But I cannot get to the level of conviction necessary to buy them."

Munger: "Other people will always understand those companies better than we do.. .we have the reverse of 'an edge'."

Buffett: "The chances of being way wrong in IBM are probably less than being way wrong in Google or Apple -- at least for us."
"Apple makes brilliant products, I just don't know how to value it."

On How do you Supervise Businesses like BNSF: 
Buffett: "BNSF runs their own business very much. I talk to (the CEO) on the phone probably once every three months or so. Fortunately, we've got economics on our side. That usually wins out."
"Railroad is a wonderful product. Railroad companies do have to be involved in politics. They need lobbyists, need to play the political game. It would be very dumb for the country to do anything that would discourage the railroad industry from spending capital to maintain infrastructure."
"Railroads have become so much more efficient, by a huge factor. It's a fundamentally very good way to move heavy stuff across a long distance."

Munger: "BNSF is a terrific business with terrific management."

On How to Share information across Berkshire's many Businesses:
Munger: "We don't share information across businesses."

Buffett: "We're the most uncoordinated [conglomerate]. We want our businesses to run very autonomously. We don't tell our managers how to run their businesses."

On Compensation committees and HR Departments: 
Buffett: "Our businesses are all so different, it would be crazy to have some standard formula."
"I am the compensation committee. I am not overworked."

Munger: "The prostitution industry would be a step up for most compensation consultants."

On USA's GDP per capita Growth in the future: 
Buffett: "If the population grows 1% a year and real GDP grows 2% a year, that would be remarkable. (Meaning that 3% growth is very good) it would result in a quadrupling of real GDP per capita over a century."
In my lifetime, the real GDP per capita has increased 6x. We have $48,000 GDP per capita. We are unbelievably rich."

Munger: "For a very mature economy with a lot of social safety net, I think 1% per capita [real GDP growth rate of America over the next 20 years] would be a sensational result."

On Berkshire paying Dividends one day:
Buffett: "By and large we feel (so far justifiably) that we can create more than a dollar of value by reinvesting every dollar we retain. For 47 years, that's been the case. If someone wants to create their own income stream, they can do so by selling shares."
"If we'd paid out dividends, our shareholders would be worth less money. I think that will continue to be the case."

Munger: "Dividend will come eventually, but we hope that's a long way off."

On Learning from Mistakes: 
Buffett: "We make mistakes. We're always thinking about worst-case situations. I don't worry much about mistakes. The next mistake is always something different. I think I've learned more about people over the years. Ill make mistakes in people inevitably, but I'll recognize the extraordinary ones more easily than I would have 40 or 50 years ago."

Munger: "What we've done is learn enough from other people's mistakes - it's a much more pleasant way to learn your lessons."

Buffett: "In terms of financial history, I've always been absolutely absorbed by reading about disasters."

On Businesses with High Barriers to Entry:
Buffett: "If you gave me $10B, $20B, $30B and told me to knock off the Coca-Cola company with a new soft drink, I wouldn't have the slightest idea how to do that."
"Richard Branson came to this country with Virgin cola (they say a brand is a promise), and we haven't heard anything about that since."

Until this time next year!

Regards
Tri I. Suseno

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Warren Buffett's 2011 Annual Letter summary - fresh from the oven

Dear all, 


Every year at around this time I normally send my family, as well as some of my friends and colleagues the latest annual letter from Warren Buffett. Please find below the summary of the latest Annual Letter (2011) - fresh from the oven (out just under 2-3 hours ago).



Here are a summary of a few key points I found interesting this year: 

  • Berkshire Hathaway's per-share book value increased by 4.6% in 2011 (after-tax), compared to 2.1% in 2011 for S&P 500 (before-tax)

Some success stories include: 
  • 3 successor CEO candidates already identified by the Board; as well as two young investment managers being tested as future Chief Investment Officers  
  • Lubrizol acquisition last year. He mentioned how Lubrizol has increased, since 2004, pre-tax earnings from $147 million to $1,085 million in 2011.
  • Each of Berkshire's five largest non-insurance companies - BNSF (railway), Iscar, Lubrizol, Marmon Group (diversified) and MidAmerican Energy) - delivered record operating earnings. In aggregate, they earned more than $9 billion pre-tax in 2011 (he forecasted next year in aggregate they should exceed $10 billion pre-tax earnings in 2012). Contrast that to seven years ago, when Berkshire only owned one of the five, MidAmerican, whose pre-tax earnings were $393 million. 
  • Insurance operations delivered record "float" - money that doesn't belong to Berkshire, but Buffett and co get to invest for Berkshire's benefit - which stood at a staggering $70 billion today (from $41 billion nine years ago). Moreover, these floats have produced 'negative cost of capital' because it has generated consecutive underwriting profits over the same nine years period, aggregating $17 billion. 
  • Significant investment in IBM (5.5%). Buffett praised IBM: "CEOs Lou Gerstner and Sam Palmisano did a superb job in moving IBM from near-bankruptcy twenty years ago to its prominence today. Their operational accomplishments were truly extraordinary .... But their financial management was equally brilliant ... Indeed, I can think of no major company that has had better financial management... The company has used debt wisely, made value-adding acquisitions almost exclusively for cash and aggressively purchased its own stock."
Some not-successful stories include: 
  • $2 billion Buffett spent buying several bond issues of Energy Future Holdings a few years ago was a big mistake. The company's prospect in large measure was tied to the price of natural gas, which tanked shortly after this purchase. Buffett said, "I totally miscalculated the gain/loss probabilities when I purchased the bonds. In tennis parlance, this was a major unforced error by your chairman."
  • Housing recovery in the US has not occurred since the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. In aggregate, Berkshire's five housing-related companies had pre-tax profit of $513 million in 2011, which is similar to 2010 but down from $1.8 billion in 2006. But he said, "Housing will come back - you can be sure of that" and with it, the current dire unemployment situation in the US will improve significantly.

  • Buffett then spent time talking about the stock buy-back that Berkshire did and the rationale of this buy-back
    • Last September, Berkshire announced it will buy-back its shares at a price of up to 110% of book value. They were only in the market for a few days "- buying $67 million of stock - before the price advanced beyond our limit."
    • Buffett said: "Charlie and I favor [stock] repurchases when two conditions are met: first, a company has ample funds to take care of operational and liquidity needs of its business; second, its stock is selling at a material discount to the company's intrinsic business value, conservatively calculated.... We have witnessed many bouts of repurchasing that failed our second test."
    • He also said that if companies that he liked and is invested in, e.g., IBM, decides to repurchase its shares over the next five years, it is far better for IBM's share price to be lower over the next five years than higher, which he says is not really how most people think. He recommended readers to read Chapter 8 of Ben Graham's "Intelligent Investor" on how to think about market fluctuations.

  • Buffett then looked at four major sectors of his operations; First: Insurance
    • "Float" has increased from $39m in 1970 to $237m in 1980, to $1.6bn in 1990, to $27.9bn in 2000 and $70.6bn today. And they are currently generating underwriting profits!
    • But Buffett warned: "Let me emphasize once again that cost-free float is not an outcome to be expected for the property-casualty [insurance] industry as a whole: We don't think there is much "Berkshire-quality" float existing in the insurance world. In most years, including 2011, the industry's premiums have been inadequate to cover claims plus expenses. Consequently, the industry's overall return on tangible equity has for many decades fallen far short of the average return realized by American industry, a sorry performance almost certain to continue. Berkshire's outstanding economics exist only because we have some terrific managers ...". The main Berkshire insurance divisions by float size are:
      • Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance Group run by Ajit Jain. From a standing start in 1985, Ajit has created an insurance business with float of $34 billion today (and significant underwriting profit).
      • General Re run by Tad Montross - around $20 billion of float. 
      • GEICO run by Tony Nicely - "almost-impossible-to-replicate business model" - $11.1 billion float.
      • Other insurance divisions - almost $6 billion float.

  • Second: Regulated, Capital-Intensive Business
    • Two very large businesses here: 
      • BNSF (railway) - Net earnings after tax around $3 billion (pre-tax $4.7 billion).
      • MidAmerican Energy - Net earnings after tax to Berkshire around $1.2 billion. 
      • Buffett said: "In each instance..., Charlie and I believe current intrinsic value is far greater than book value."

  • Third: Manufacturing, Service and Retailing Operations
    • Total pre-tax earnings of around $5 billion. Non-housing's component of this is $4.68 billion, which has increased steadily and significantly since 2009, denoting a strong recovery of US economy since 09 except for housing. 
    • The four housing-related companies had aggregate pre-tax earnings of $359 million in 2011. 
    • Buffett: "Though housing-related businesses remain in the emergency room, most other businesses have left the hospital with their health fully restored."
    • Some superstar businesses and managers in this sector are: 
      • CTB (agricultural equipment operation) and its CEO, Vic Mancinelli. Buffett: "We purchased CTB in 2002 for $139 million. It has subsequently distributed $180 million to Berkshire, last year earned $124 million pre-tax and has $109 million in cash. Vic has made a number of bolt-on acquisitions over the years, including a meaningful one he has signed up after yearend."
      • TTI, electric components distributor, increased its sales to a record $2.1 billion, up 12.4% from 2010. Earnings hit a record, up 127% from 2007, the year Berkshire bought the business. 
      • Iscar, 80% owned by Berkshire. 
      • McLane, a huge distribution company, had a pre-tax earnings record of $370 million. 
      • Netjets delivered pre-tax earnings of $227 million in 2011. Buffett: "A few years ago NetJets was my number one worry... Without Berkshire's support, NetJets would have gone broke. These problems are behind us.... No other fractional-ownership operator has remotely the size and breadth of the NetJets operation, and none ever will."
      • Marmon, which Buffett bought from the Pritzker family in 2008, which owns 140 operating businesses in 11 distinct business sectors.
      • See's Candies last year had record pre-tax earnings of $83 million, bringing its total to $1.65 billion since Berkshire bought it (around 1972). Contrast that to the purchase price the business of $25 million and 2011 end-of-year book value (net of cash) of less than zero!! 
      • Nebraska Furniture Mart (80% owned).
    • Although overall Buffett praised this segment of the business ("overall this sector is a winner for us"), Buffett lamented the purchase of smaller companies in this sector. Buffett: "I have made my share of mistakes in buying small companies. Charlie [Munger] long ago told me, "If something's not worth doing at all, it's not worth doing well," and I should have listened harder." and "In any event, our large purchases have generally worked well - extraordinarily well in a few cases...". 

  • Fourth: Finance and Financial Products
    • Berkshire's smallest sector; includes two rental companies, XTRA (trailers) and CORT (furniture), and Clayton Homes, the largest producer of manufactured homes in the US. 
    • Clayton has struggled since the GFC in 2008: Manufactured housing sales in the US were 51,606 in 2011 compared to 146,744 in 2005. Despite this, it has operated profitably. Buffett: "Clayton's earnings should improve materially when the nation's excess housing inventory is worked off."
    • Buffett: "I believe the intrinsic value of the three businesses in this sector does not differ materially from book value."

  • Other interesting comments:
    • On how to define "terrific economics" of businesses Berkshire owns: "measured by earnings on unleveraged net tangible assets that run from 25% after-tax to more than 100%."
    • "Good" economics businesses "... produce good returns [earnings on unlevereaged net tangible assets] in the area of 12-20%."
    • Lower than these are "very poor returns, a result of some serious mistakes I made in my job of capital allocation."
    • Buffett also talked about the three investment possibilities: 1. in cash, currency and fixed interest, 2. in non-producing assets (including tulips and gold), and 3. in producing assets (businesses). He, of course, favour the third category. Buffett: "I believe that over any extended period of time this category of investing will prove to be the runaway winner among the three we've examined. More important, it will be by far the safest."

Until next year's annual report, 

Regards

Tri